Aboriginal Art in the Sixties: Fine and Popular
- 51 details
- 75 details
- 107 details
- 106 details
- 105 details
- 104 details
- 98 details
- 97 details
- 96 details
- 74 details
- 163 details
- 71 details
- 69 details
- 65 details
- 820 details
- 816 details
- 814 details
- 813 details
- 108 details
- 240 details
- 809 details
- 54 details
- 59 details
- 10 details
- 180 details
- 168 details
- 167 details
- 824 details
- 823 details
- 817 details
- 181 details
- 815 details
- 241 details
- 811 details
- 787 details
- 786 details
- 784 details
- 242 details
- 810 details
- 244 details
- 52 details
- 158 details
- 171 details
- 166 details
- 165 details
- 162 details
- 161 details
- 160 details
- 159 details
- 157 details
- 176 details
- 156 details
- 103 details
- 102 details
- 101 details
- 93 details
- 60 details
- 55 details
- 174 details
- 177 details
- 172 details
- 243 details
- 170 details
- 169 details
- 164 details
- 73 details
- 828 details
- 819 details
- 818 details
- 234 details
- 178 details
- 233 details
- 232 details
- 231 details
- 230 details
- 183 details
- 182 details
- 821 details
- 179 details
- 89 details
Migration, Mobility and the City
Vancouver developed in the heart of Musqueam traditional territory, which encompasses the entire lower mainland. In its midst, the city had local First Nations who, in the late 19th century, began to live on allocated Indian reserves. Other aboriginal groups and individuals whose history of seasonal mobility can be traced to traditional trade economies, and later to wage labour industries such as fishing, logging and long-shoring also came to the city. These people were part of a “return migration”; moving back and forth between reserves and work places.
This was a pattern familiar to artists such as Mungo Martin and George Clutesi who had been labourers. It is important to see their respective moves to the city to develop an economically viable art practice in the context of men who worked these ‘jobs’ to support their families. In this sense, Ellen Neel and Henry Speck were also part of this mobile art practice that included a larger history of a labour-based return migration. In contrast, in the 1940s, younger people such as Francis Baptiste and Judith Morgan were part of a ‘Indian art’ practice that included regional, national and international institutions; their subsequent moves to attend post-secondary art schools in the United States were linked to significant individuals in museums and residential schools that supported contemporary “Indian art.”
This need for institutional connections and support was also true for other young people in the late 50s and 60s such as Doug Cranmer who came to carve at the Museum of Anthropology with Bill Reid, and for a young Robert Davidson who came to attend high school. They (and others) were part of long standing return mobility between village and city, unlike Neel who moved permanently to Vancouver. She and other aboriginal artists, and the young couples who later came to take advantage of off-reserve housing in the late sixties, would depend on new kinds of social networks, assistance, and information to survive. Some brilliant young artists like Pat McGuire, who came from Haida-Gwaii got lost in the city. These artists paid the dues for those who came later and took on the mantle of professional artists making “high art.”